Currently viewing the tag: "thermal loading"

NASA Protein Crystal Growth (PCG). High quality crystals grown in microgravity to determine 3 D structureCan you pass the protein? I’ll have a little protein with that. I’m dragging a little, I think I need some protein. I’m really trying to bulk up, what are you eating for your protein?

Okay, I admit I was of the same mindset. I once recommended “one serving of protein and one serving of carbohydrate with every meal.” I lost 50 lbs on that advice and yet when challenged by a 11 year old girl with a simple question my “belief system” was stopped in it’s tracks. I took biochemistry in undergraduate and graduate school. I worked in the Biophysics Branch at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.

While there, I even participated in research on protein crystal growth. We wanted to grow these crystals in the quiescent environment of microgravity (weightlessness) to determine the 3D structure – a lock and key approach to the many complex biological systems sustaining life.  Back then I studied the growth of hen egg-white lysozyme and also had my blood drawn weekly to extract hemoglobin to developed liquid-liquid chromatography techniques to resolve separation of from other model proteins like horseradish peroxidase and whale myoglobin.

My goal of telling you that is not to establish credibility or to boast. It’s for you to consider after we go through what should have been an obvious understanding to anyone that has studied biochemistry or protein chemistry in detail. It’s to demonstrate just how profoundly ignorant EVERYONE seems to be about this subject when it comes to food. I’m as guilty of it as anyone.  It’s as if there is a mysterious wall put up and we all just blindly follow the common explanation in a trance marching one by one over a cliff.

I had all of the information and background necessary and could not answer the simple question from that 11 year old girl on the spot:

“if you’re eating beef for protein, where do cows get protein, because they eat grass?”

I honestly couldn’t completely answer the question. I left that day back in 2009 and headed to attend my first TEDMED conference. There I met some of the most amazing scientists from  Nobel prize winning Biochemist, Kary Mullis, to Apple Co-Founder, Steve Wozniak. The list goes on and among that list was Cardiologist, Dr Dean Ornish and his wife, Anne. They’ve been involved in helping heart patients for years. His work has been featured and ridiculed, but it’s never been disproven. They run a successful practice in beautiful Sausalito California and were even named the 2012 top heart-healthy diet by U.S. News and World Report a few weeks ago.

TEDMED is about being vulnerable and asking questions. I’d been working on lowering my total cholesterol. It started at 240 and had come down to 220 with diet, exercise, and weight loss. I had a debate with a female, “rock-star” friend in late 2008 that convinced me to try Pescetarian (fish, dairy, and eggs only).  This did result in a change in my cholesterol taking it from 220 to 209.  My  “protein” was reduced to dairy (mostly yogurt and occasional cheese) and Fish (mostly salmon) – no “red meat” and no chicken.

Dean was quite clear, “Ray, cut the dairy and limit the servings of fish until you reach your goal and then, if you want, you can add some fish back, but it’s not necessary. I would steer clear of the dairy.”

Crap, I LOVE yogurt. I LOVE cheese. I was drinking WHEY “protein supplements.” Additionally, I LOVE eggs, but stick to egg whites. You know, I like lamb with mint sauce, but I’m a scientist and quite frankly I had never even considered eliminating ALL animal products.

This brought me full circle to that question posed by this very bright 11 year old girl in California: where would I get my “protein?”

Bohemian like you..

Dean didnt say it, but I was thinking it. No, not the V-word. Eat vegan? AYFKM? How would I get my protein? Wow, do I need to mix up vegetable protein sources to get complete protein?  I don’t want anyone to jump to conspiracy theories. I have mentioned I ate a completely vegan for fourteen months (for the record, a year after my 50 weight loss with using cold exposure) as a self-experiment and I can’t explain away the results:

My total cholesterol dropped to 135.

It was a self-test no different than the work on mild cold stress. I’m not here to simply “advocate veganism,” nor am I particularly motivated by pushing animal rights. I’ve hunted and I grew up with 200 head of cattle on our family farm. I am not a “reformed meat eater,” but a scientist that wants to understand the basic facts about nutrition. I am fascinated by what happens on a “plant-based diet” and I lived it completely for 14 months, so I do understand it – the difficulties, traveling, activist agendas, and ridicule. It was quite clear that I saw results with a plant-based diet that simply never happened when I was eating meat and dairy. Even my adult acne (mainly on my back and triceps) completely vanished.

Have I offended everyone yet?

My motivation is to understand why the explanation of the food I eat was clashing with what my text books taught, but most importantly this question from an 11 year old girl REALLY puzzled me. After all, some of the biggest animals, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, elephants, elk and even my own “protein” sources (cows, pigs, lambs and chickens), are all herbivores. Big fish eat little fish, but what do little fish eat?

I am driven by understanding the energy. We must follow the thermodynamics, because I don’t believe for one minute that the second law is wrong. To understand what I learned, I am going to have back up a little and help you learn, or refresh your memory, on the fundamentals of proteins in biochemistry. Let’s learn about proteins, but we’re not talking about Turkey or Tofu. We are going to discuss REAL protein not a classification for food.

Protein: it’s part of a complete breakfast.

cellulose, glucose, starch

Starch and Cellulose are made from the same building block, Glucose. They have a different saccharide bond that holds them together.

Remember when I outlined carbohydrates? Do you recall that starch (bake potato) and cellulose (e.g. wood fiber) are the same thing: long chains of glucose or sugar? When we digest starch we break it down into units of glucose. The same is true when termites eat wood. We discussed long and short chained fatty acids, which also get broken down.

The energy in ALL of these molecules are in the bonds that hold them together. For example, fiber doesn’t have calories, because you don’t have the enzyme to break the beta-linkage between the glucose. Bacteria in the rumen (a stomach) of a cow CAN do it. The bacteria get the energy from breaking down the fiber and then the cow absorbs the resulting glucose. A baby calf grows 600-800 lbs in a year on grass we can’t digest.

Protein is also made up of a fundamental unit called an amino acid (see figure). These amino acids are the building blocks of all proteins from the “meat” we eat to enzymes, specialized proteins like amylase and pepsin, we used to break down food into absorbable nutrients. Scientists call these large strings of amino acids or glucose (as in starch/fiber) macromolecules. Plants, fungus, animals and bacteria – all living things – depend on macromolecules. Even a non-living virus is composed of genetic material and a protein coat.

Proteins are repeating units of various amino acids (R varies). We can grow protein crystals and determine the 3D structures.

Proteins are repeating units of various amino acids (R varies). We can grow protein crystals and determine the 3D structures.

A single cell contains between 100,000 and 1,000,000 different kinds of molecules and a little over half of these are macromolecules such as protein, nucleic acids (RNA/DNA) and polysaccharides (carbohydrates)

For today, understand that protein is to an amino acid as Starch is to glucose (sugar). Our body doesn’t need starch or protein. Our body needs glucose and amino acids. We don’t bolt  oyster protein onto our biceps after we slurp them down. Equally important is that pasta isn’t shoved into a marathon runner’s quads when he carb-loads before a race.

Digestion (we’ll study this further after finishing protein) breaks down these macromolecules from the plants and animals we ingest and it is the base units – the amino acids and sugars – that are then reassembled by our body into useful macromolecules. Protein is synthesize from amino acids in ribosomes of the cell cytoplasm and glycogen (remember it’s the animal version of “starch”) is manufactured primarily in the liver and muscle tissue from glucose in the blood.

Do you see the big picture here? We take in this complex food, with all the proteins, carbohydrates and fat contained within, and then it is completely broken down to its individual components (e.g. amino acids and glucose) during digestion.  At that point your body creates the specific macromolecule it NEEDS (proteins and glycogen) from these little lego-blocks.

This is indisputable and yet our idea of eating “protein, carbs and fat” does not really capture this at all. What REALLY is happening at the most basic level is:

1) The body needs ENERGY (carbohydrate, fat or protein are all used) to keep warm, move, build tissue, activate the many biochemical reactions of life
2) The body needs NUTRIENTS (amino acids, vitamins, phytochemicals and minerals) for components/catalysts (lego blocks) to create the 50,000-500,000 macromolecules that form each cell in your body.

The confusion comes in because dieting, particularly weight loss, is about minimizing macronutrient energy consumption (fuel), while continuing to provide sufficient micronutrients (service) for repair and function. It’s further complicated by the fact that protein is both a source of amino acid nutrients AND can be used as a back up fuel.

Lego of protein to understand

The best thing you can do, and I am not splitting hairs here, is to substitute the words “amino acids” every time you say, I need “protein.” Chances are you don’t “need” it, but at least it will help remind you what your body really needs. You likely don’t crave it at all – it’s a myth. The body does not store amino acids – cells grab them from the blood stream all the time. Our body needs 20 different amino acids to build all proteins and half, the 10 nonessential amino acids, our body manufactures without the need to ingest. The other half, 10 indispensable or essential amino acids, we must ingest in our food. The truth is, whether a body builder or growing child, you don’t need “protein” at all. You need amino acids so that the body can synthesize or manufacture its OWN protein.

Plant cells are made up of proteins as well. There is nothing more “plantish” then chlorophyll (the green photosynthesis lifeblood of leaves) and each plant cell contains the complex organic molecule chlorophyll along with MANY proteins. Insulin is a protein. Milk casein is a protein. Wheat gluten is a protein. Amylase is a protein. Egg whites are about 10% protein (13 different kinds, balance is water). Some are allergic to bee venom proteins. We all react to protein neurotoxins in snake venom bites. If you are allergic to pollen, strawberries, shellfish or cats…your body is reacting to PROTEINS.

Our body NEEDS amino acids, but it is set up to DEFEND against foreign protein. The entire immune system is based on recognition of protein which cloak a virus, attacking and then eliminating identified invaders from the body. HIV is a particularly difficult virus because it’s protein coat goes through a change as new copies are produced – like trying to chase a criminal with a mug shot that changes after each crime. Autoimmune diseases is simply when our immune systems starts think “us” is “them.”  It goes on a rant – attacking your own protein and destroying vital biological function.

Protein: useful in journal articles, useless for menus

The body and it’s ability to produce  unimmaginably complex proteins that literally create life is astonishing and we all should know better than to trivialize it. Scientists all know that we don’t “need to manage protein” in our diet and yet I was guilty of the same psychobabble as the rest of them. It was a convenient way of categorizing food that has reached it’s limit.  We don’t have to use this very imprecise word, protein, quoined in 1838.  It even confuses physicians and most nutritionists. We all just want to know what to eat and yet our NEW government plate no longer says “meat,” because that is simply not true and so they have gone in reverse semantically and now say protein.

On the next post, I will delve more into protein and continue to give you a new way to think about it. The answers will be obvious. Until then, please take a look at this amazing video, originally produced by a world-renowned medical illustrator that happens follows this blog.

Hi-res narrated version here: Harvard Multimedia site

 

Perhaps you too will see the astonishing beauty in the complexity of protein in all life. If you are familiar with cell biology, maybe you’ll even recognize some of the many chemical reactions that keep us alive. Make no mistake about it – no one that truly thinks about it would EVER ask: So, where are you getting your protein?  Protein is ubiquitous in everything we eat. We’ll discuss more about amino acids, but keep in mind that proteins lay at the very heart of our immune system.  The many chronic issues we face today could in fact be lurking in the massive quantities of foreign protein we are exposed to routinely.

Btw, I don’t want to debate vegan vs paleo vs slowcarb, etc… It’s boring and irrelevant and I have experimented with all of them.  What I am interested in are questions comments about amino acids and hearing what you have to think about this explanation. There is a lot to…digest…so, after some time for discussion, I will post Part 2 and we’ll explore the various sources of amino acids and how that may have impacts on health.

**************
Do you like these blogs and want to help me? Please take a minute to scroll up on the right side of the screen to consider making a monthly donation to this program. You can also make a one time donation here:

Thanks!
Ray

 

Irisin transforming fat to BATWe take a quick break from our macronutrient discussion to talk about some really exciting news in the hypothermics world that showed up in the last two weeks. It’s great when new data shows that old thoughts might be wrong.  This one comes from researchers at Harvard Medical School (and a host of other institutions).(1)  These scientist discovered a new hormone, irisin, named after the greek goddess iris – the personification of the rainbow and messenger of the gods.

What is most exciting is that this hormone could be another piece of the “calorie” controversy – the irritating paradox of calorie in, calorie out.  So let’s take a look at what they found.

Only the Good Die Young

In the past we have discussed the role of the uncoupling protein, UCP1, that instructs the mitochondria to generate excess heat instead of producing ATP.  This protein is mediated by another very important co-activator, PGC1-α. You may have heard about it in connection with what are called the Sirtuin proteins. If not, let’s back up and review a little on these before getting into this new discovery.

By regulating the production/activation of this family of molecules, scientist have not only been able to vastly alter obesity in mammals, they also are able to affect animal longevity.  You’ve heard of Resveratrol by now and these are the very same metabolic pathways altered by that molecule. (2-4)

PCG1-alpha altered mice show dramatically different aging.

Increased PGC-1α expression in skeletal muscle prevents age-associated weight gain and improves exercise capacity during aging. (A) Comparison of mice expressing the PGC-1α transgene in skeletal muscle (MCK-PGC-1α) and wild-type littermates (control) at different ages. (B and C) Lean and fat mass of 22-month-old wild-type and PGC-1α animals as determined by DEXA scans, (D) Relative hindlimb mass of 22-month-old wild-type and PGC-1α animals (E) Treadmill performance test at different ages for wild-type and PGC-1α animals; Source: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 1;106(48):20405-10. Epub 2009 Nov 16.

For example, if you look the the photo to the right, you’ll see a pair of mice. One mouse (left),  was genetically modified to have enhanced PGC1-α and compared to a normal control mouse (right).  Just a scan of the photos and you will quickly see that the modified mouse ages “gracefully.”  Its control cage-mate gets plump like the rest of us even though it’s in the same environment. The genetically modified mouse stays healthy.

It doesn’t stop there. Take a look at graph “E” to on the bottom right.  That is the difference in performance of Treadmill tests (I wonder if they used Livestrong?).  Look at the difference of performance at 22 months! Like a fine red wine, these mice get better with age.  In addition to the lack of weight gain and increased running skills, these mice showed no age-related bone loss or insulin resistance and the typical systemic inflammatory response was mitigated.

Despite what people might say, you’re not going to get these results from drinking red wine (sorry), but these are incredible first steps to unlocking the mystery of aging and metabolic syndrome.

Message to My Blubber

The new research identifying the irisin hormone is just as exciting.  This hormone was hidden as part of a much larger molecule and these researchers were able to  isolate it.  Irisin is secreted as a result of exercise in both these transgenic (modified) mice and Humans.  It turns out that this is way for the muscle to “communicate’ with the forming white adipose cells, signaling them to become the more energetic brown adipose tissue (BAT).  The concentration of this hormone jumped sharply after exercise (Human and mice).

The researchers went a step further.

By doing experiments in cultures, they discovered that nano molar levels (tiny amounts) of this hormone cause a 50-fold increase in the UPC1 protein. When delivered in vivo (in the animal) they still saw a 10-20 fold increase of in UCP1, which resulted in an increased energy expenditure and improvement in the glucose tolerance of mice fed a high fat diet.  But a nagging question remained. What purpose would be served by a hormone being released in response to exercise that INCREASED energy consumption?  One might thing that the opposite would be true – evolution would dictate conservation of energy.

Cavemen Didn’t Exercise

A long time before 5-toe shoes and grown men (and women) running through NYC Central Park beating their chest and throwing boulders, we were far more like the bird sitting on your back porch (unless you are looking at a pigeon – they don’t count); we starved.  If you look all around you and ignore domesticated animals (including pigeons and rats), you will find that every animal is starving.  They live to eat every day and it is a struggle to find calorie.  It is THE struggle that anthropologist are still trying to unravel with Humans.

Where did we get the energy to become the modern-day intellectual giant?

You should see the conflict. If we were starving and now find that a hormone is released in response to strenuous activity, which turns energy storing white fat into energy burning brown fat, that would be a NEGATIVE not a positive evolutionary trait. The quest to find food would be a downward energy spiral.

Ah, but we really had no reason to run through the park or roll giant tires around. Why would our ancestors need to exercise?  It turns out that there is one activity that WOULD cause a lot of muscle activity, yes it’s shivering.  It was a way for animals to keep warm and in response to the biological stress of cold, muscle secreting a hormone to create more BAT to keep warm was a GOOD thing.  It meant staving off hypothermia.

A further interesting fact is that PGC1-α was originally discovered by scientists, because it was unregulated by cold exposure.  We also know that in addition to caloric restriction, mild cold stress is the only other way that we have demonstrated longevity in mice. Even more exciting is that recent tests (unpublished) have show a nearly 5-fold increase of BAT output of a 52 year old man vs 20 year old controls.  This increase was even though they had similar levels of BAT, so there is even more energy to tap into. You can adapt and cause increased metabolic activity.

Un-wrapping it All

I think we are seeing just the tip of where all of this is going. In the last decade we have moved from the idea that we lose all of our BAT with aging, to we have a fixed amount of BAT, to now understanding there are hormonal mechanisms to create new BAT.  Further the exact pathways that are responsible for longevity through caloric restriction also are affected by mild cold stress.  These systems respond to biological stress of starvation and cold, like a muscle responds to the stress of weight training,  by creating a more resilient biology.

Mild cold stress does not have to be miserable, or even cold.  It can come in a lot of different forms. In the David Agus new Book, The End of Illness, he discusses at great length the role of inflammation in aging. He even gives an example of a one of his “all-star” cancer patients. Diagnosed with prostate cancer at the age of nearly 80, he decided to make a life changes that include swimming every day. He is now almost 90 and doing incredible.

I have documented the profound ability to thermal load through swimming.  In addition we know that mild cold stress starts in warm water (27C/80F).  Today we have learned that a hormone has been identified that is not only increases PGC1-α, it’s causes all the benefits of longevity seen through sirtuin activation. It’s exciting to see this all come together and I know we’ll only learn more. This is not the ice cube diet or really even “freeze your ass off,” it’s a basic adaptation with millions of years of evolutionary excellence.

Turn the heater off, go for a walk, let go of a few layers, move,  or just swim – do something.  You have nothing to lose and we all look funny as hell in shorts, gloves and face masks.  If laughter is the best medicine, worse case is you’ll make someone live longer by laughing.

Ray

 

(1) Boström PA, et al.,  “PGC1-α-dependent myokine that drives brown-fat-like development of white fat and thermogenesis,” Nature. 2012 Jan 11. doi: 10.1038/nature10777. [Epub ahead of print]

(2) Wenz T, et al. “Increased muscle PGC-1alpha expression protects from sarcopenia and metabolic disease during aging,”Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 1;106(48):20405-10. Epub 2009 Nov 16.

(3) Tong Shi, et al. “SIRT3, a Mitochondrial Sirtuin Deacetylase, Regulates Mitochondrial Function and Thermogenesis in Brown Adipocytes,” J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, No. 14, Issue of April 8, pp. 13560–13567, 2005

(4) Marcia C. Haigis and Leonard P. Guarente, “Mammalian sirtuins—emerging roles in physiology, aging, and calorie restriction,” Genes Dev. 2006 20: 2913-2921.

**************
Do you like these blogs and want to help me? Please take a minute to scroll up on the right side of the screen consider making a monthly donation to this program. You can also make a one time donation here:

Thanks!
Ray

carbohydrates, like potatoes need not be your enemy. These can be good sources of nutritionIn Part 1, we began the process of distinguishing the difference between a food group and a macronutrient. Carbohydrates (Carbs) are probably the most vilified of the macronutrients. This is probably due to the ubiquitous availability of starch foods throughout human history. For the most part, oils, fats, and meats were the food of the rich. Everyone else ate beans, rice and potatoes.

If we listed the many staple foods: grains, rice, beans, squash, quinoa, potatoes and corn we see a high amount of starch. Remember, starch is simply a long chain of glucose. We all need glucose to live and our primary energy is derived from glucose and stored glycogen or fat (more later).

I want you to know that a carbohydrate need not be fattening, nor lead to diabetes.  In fact, Carbohydrates can be very satiating (1) for 4-5 hours after meals. What seems to be the big diversion, where the “bad carbs” come in, is the processing (blending, frying, flouring, pasting, etc) of carbohydrate.  When we break down starch too much in the food preparation process, it leads to lots of simple sugars. These are both easy to overeat and can have other deleterious health effects.

Starch digestion begins in the mouth with the amylase in the saliva. The starch begins to break down to glucose.  A great way to experience this first hand is to take a unsalted cracker and just hold it in your mouth. You will begin to generate a lot of saliva and as you hold it there, begin to taste sweetness as the glucose is formed. Remember, a termite can do exactly the same thing with cellulose in wood.

From an evolutionary biology perspective, the AMY1 gene that is responsible for making amylase is so important  that you have as many as 12 copies of it (2).  It was extremely important to our hunter-gather predecessors. While there’s been much put forward on the “hunting” side of the equation, some of the most recent anthropology suggest that the “gathering” side dominated.  Underground storage organs (USOs – tubers, bulbs, corms, and rhizomes) played a significant role in our energy management of times past.

Men like the idea of beating their chest and running through the woods hunting and they write a lot of the stories, but gathering is actually a better (less sexy) explanation of our survival. It even allows the elderly to participate productively in the group, even grandmothers would have a significant role in the earliest tribes. Anyone can dig up a potato, they aren’t very fast, and they grow in predicable places.

The naked mole rat is found with archeology of hominid population explosions and points to USOs as a gathered food source. click photo for NPR Story

Many of the early tools used to process USOs were probably made of wood and didn’t survive in the archeological records, but the early Hominid starch crystals in teeth have. Also there are also fossilized populations of mole rats that surge with every human population expansion (3). We’ll also learn that the mole rat has some FASCINATING genetics that impacts thermal loading.

I don’t want to get into the Paleolithic debate. What I want everyone to see is that starch IS an important evolutionary part of your fuel system, but at the same time recognize french fries are NOT the starch I am talking about.  Your view of carbohydrate has been jaded since the beginning of diets. In the earliest of diets (Banting) it was simple breads combined with butter/sugar that caused the excess energy to creep in. Processed starch (sugars) of all kinds can lead to excess caloric intake; it’s just easy to digest and pleasurable to overeat, especially when combined with salt and fat.

For today, understand that primary complex carbohydrates: squash, legumes, onions, carrots, whole corn, whole rice, and potato are all good bases of energy. They are satiating ways to make up for caloric deficit, but don’t confuse those items, “items your great grandmother would recognize as food,” Michael Pollan might say, with the “carbs” served at school lunch.

Most importantly understand that many of these “starchy” foods also contain significant proteins with complete compliment of the essential amino acids your body will use to synthesize your own protein. These complex carbohydrates are broken down by amylase to glucose: the fuel for your brain and many cells in the body.  If they aren’t consumed with excessive alternate energy sources (like excessive fat or simple sugar), your body will tap into it’s own fat reserves.  If too much pre-processing is performed, then you might see increased problems managing blood sugar.

Eating carbohydrate is convenient and pleasurable, and know there is room for “carbs” in your diet if you make the correct choices.

So, when we are putting this all together and I say carbohydrate, I want you to think about these whole, starchy food items that enter YOUR kitchen/cooking reasonably resembling how they came out of the ground or off the plant. Sugar, raw, brown…whatever, is refined. I challenge you to eat the 250 lbs of sugar a year  gnawing on sugarcane, however; you might be able to do it with grapes or beets.

Others have commented on fructose, a simple sugar in fruit, and I think there is merit to the issues that come from too many simple sugars, especially highly processed. This likely includes high fructose corn syrup, apple juice, sucrose, agave nectar, etc…).  Fruits are not found in nature year round, but USOs are. Similarly, think about what is easily stored (beans vs beets).  It’s amazing to hear people rave about “natural agave nectar” (inulin/fructose squeezed from agave) and then begin to lambast the food industry for high fructose corn syrup (fructose squeezed from corn). Yes there are some differences, but we’ll debate it in 5-10 years.  It’s all simple sugar  to me and best avoided.

These simple sugars are energy without the fiber or micronutrients. Others, like Robert Lustig, have covered the issue of fructose in far better detail than I will, but likely our problem as a nation is probably more related to drinking, for example, too much apple juice, rather than eating too many apples. The same is true of french fries vs potatoes. The larger group health statistics just don’t separate the issues (e.g. apples vs apple juice or fries vs potato) with enough granularity and it is all complicated with saturated fats and other compounding, synergistic concoctions we now call food.

Many energy dense foods are now available year round (like fruits or avocados) and so we must be careful with these foods.  We’ll see a similar trend with fats, oils, and nuts.

Starch is a wonderful molecule and has been around for millions of years. Starch is just one bond different from wood.  You are designed to eat starch, with back ups systems in place (AMY1).  We can identify paleolitic starch in teeth, even knowing the plants that produced it, and so there is nothing wrong with carbohydrate as a food – it highly processing it and combining with other energy-rich processed product that causes much of the issues.

You will inevitably hear more about the amazing work anthropologist, Nathaniel Dominy is doing with starch and USOs.  I personally believe the depth and thoroughness of his work will have an impact on what many, like Loren Cordain, believe to absolute. Nate has a very uncanny ability to see past the obvious. For the record, he’s a meat eater, despite what he’s uncovered in the last few years about starch in anthropology.

In terms of the thermodynamics, most natural starches come with a compliment of other micronutrients that are beneficial.  These are “energy foods” and so we absolutely CAN lose weight by eliminating them from your diet.  I am not suggesting diets higher in fat or protein (atkins, paleolithic, slow carb) cannot be used to lose weight – I am diet agnostic. What I can explain is on whole the overall management of energy, heat (not temperature), that is responsible for your success.

If we stop isolating these foods based on our perceived/suggested notations of macronutrient content and return to simple food, A calorie will be a calorie.  Once you learn to recognize what you are consuming at every meal (and snack) you’ll see the results you’ve been after. It doesn’t even take discipline once you understand the underlying principles.

Gauging on the comments/questions, I might dig in a little more (Part 3) on carbohydrate. Eventually I will post the overall biochemistry and some have written asking me to explain the TCA cycle (that complex part in the middle of a Lustig presentation if you’ve seen one).  Otherwise, I will move onto fat and catch sugars in the wrap up.

Next week is TEDMED in San Diego. It’s hard to believe a year has past.  I’ll probably have at least one update on what I learn there, but will *try* to write two posts on fat before I leave so they can post next week.

(1)  Carbohydrates and human appetite, Blundell, JE, et al.,Am J Clin Nutr 1994;59(suppl):728S-34S.

(2) Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation, Perry, G.H., et al., Nature Genetics 39, 1256 – 1260 (2007)

(3) Communication/presentation with Dr Nathaniel Dominy, Dartmouth University Dept of Anthropology

**************
Do you like these blogs and want to help me? Please take a minute to scroll up on the right side of the screen consider making a monthly donation to this program. You can also make a one time donation here:

 

Thanks!
Ray

Proteins, carbs, and fats are your body's fuel. Indiscriminate trips back to the tank can lead to obesity. IN Tim Ferriss' Four Hour Body, Scientist Ray Cronise teaches how you can use thermal loading to lose weight   It’s been a crazy couple of months of travel, research, and writing for me, but I’ve learned some incredible new things. Over the last three years of personal transformation, an amazing clarity of overall energy balance of Human metabolism has emerged. T S Eliot wrote in the Gidding:

“We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.”

I believe I have arrived where I started and I’ve never known it better. One of the difficulties in discussing a more unified approach is just how unbelievably misinformed we all are about the basic words involved in the discussion. The diet industry has bantered about protein, carbohydrate, fat, calorie, and many other terms to such a wide-extent that my revelation was simply going back to the basics.

In simple terms, it was necessary to purge the mental construct I had grown to rely on in the past when discussing weight gain/weight loss.

I really doubt that this confusion is driven by mass corporate conspiracy.  I also believe that most who write diet books really believe their assertions and are motivated largely, because they want to help people. Everyone wants to profit and so I don’t condemn the large corporations for giving us what we demand/buy (salt, sugar and fat) nor the diet industry for rearranging the same message ad nausem to help you resist the three.

I will say the medical community, and in the United States, the USDA and NIH, on the other hand are probably more deserving of criticism. School lunch/breakfast programs begin misinforming our children at an early age and the net result has followed us all into adulthood to create a nation full of obesity. Now, this obesity trend is being exported to the rest of the world.  Physicians are able to get a medical degree without a class in nutrition and when they do study it’s the USDA Food pyramid scheme.

I certainly appreciate the efforts of Dr. John McDougall  and others for passing California SB 380 that mandates continuing education in lifestyle and nutrition in the management of chronic illness.  Rather than mindlessly attack, I’d like to pick back up from last March and present a new foundation of the calorie and in particular, its relationship to  the  macronutrients, protein, carbohydrate and fat, so that we can all at least share a common language.

During this exploration of protein, carbohydrate, and fat, I will ask that you temporarily put aside what you believe at the moment and to the extent possible, suppress the diagnosis bias.  I know that what I am going to discuss over the next few weeks is definitely contrary to what I was taught in undergraduate/graduate biochemistry class and what I believed to be true when I started my transformation; I also am confident that it is COMPLETELY consistent with the underlying science that was the foundation for nutrition.

Today, Seth Godin had an insightful blog entry that everyone should read. He’s amazing in both his deep insight to Human motivation, but most important to me, in his phenomenal ability to simply observe. These two sentences really pique my interest:

“You are welcome to believe that aqua metals will improve your sports performance and that z-rays will cure your arthritis, but only until it collides with things that are actually true. Placebos are a good thing, and everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, but they’re not entitled to their own science.”

And that seems to be the issue we have and it’s probably why you haven’t met your goals.  He goes on to say,

“The trend I’m concerned with is the notion that we’re entitled to get upset when the truth doesn’t match our point of view.”

I’m both guilty of this and I have been the recipient of it from the other end.  Fortunately, I am not motivated by politics, popularity, nor dogma, and so I am perfectly willing to change my opinion in the face of sound new data that is contrary to the data I based my previous opinion.

What is interesting is that when one takes a thermodynamic view of calorie, nutrition, and weight loss, it all becomes very obvious how the system works. It also opens the possibilities of alternate ways to view “food” and in particular what is going on in the very complex interplay of Macro vs Micro nutrients.  Once  you look through this new pair of glasses, it won’t be necessary to understand how the watch works to tell time.

For today, let’s just start with a very basic understanding of nutrition and I will invoke the much overused car analogy.

The Drive-Thru

To keep your car running you need two things: fuel and routine maintenance. The body is no different. The fuel can be in the form of Protein, Carbohydrate, or Fat and the maintenance is provided by vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, and antioxidant capacities of food along with routine cardiovascular and strength conditioning.  I don’t think anyone would disagree with that (long) sentence.

So, we have to routinely top-off the tank at the gas station and we also need to perform routine maintenance: change the oil, rotate the tires, check the timing belt, etc…  So what happens if you show up to the gas station three times a week, whether or not you need gas?  What if it became the center of business or social meetings, “hey, would you like to meet at the Exxon at 6 o’clock for a fill-up? or,  Wow, it’s about time for some gas, I haven’t filled up for hours?

Thermal Loading provides a method of losing weight at maximum rate.

How do we KNOW we need fuel? Now where's the gas gauge again?

Ok, these days you would go broke, but think about it. If you show up to “socially” or habitually fill up, where does it all go? Eventually the tank is full, so you put in in a can in the trunk. Then the the trunk is full and now we put it in the back seat – eventually strapping it on the roof. I mean, we are going on a LONG trip and have no idea where the next station is…

Get the picture?

Ah, but true to life, it’s far more complicated. We’ve just described macronutrients (fuel), but what about micronutrients (maintenance)? If it weren’t for the pesky maintenance side, we could just stop eating and hopefully by thanksgiving (or pick your favorite holiday – they ALL seem to involve food) we would have reached our goal in time for pumpkin pie.

Can we just take micronutrients in a pill and fast? Again, it’s just not that easy. Starvation (caloric restriction) does appear to lengthen life according to studies. Then again, I am told it is so miserable you just THINK life is longer. HCG/Starvation is one form of popular “severe” restriction diet. If you don’t eat you WILL lose weight. If you are not losing weight then you MUST be eating too much. NO exceptions.

This is the duplicity in the problem. We can’t just give up food like like other out of control habits with out all sorts of problems. When we forego calories, we ALL certainly lose weight. We need micronutrients (maintenance) and many of them come in macronutrient (fuel) wrappers. So an optimal plan would involve restricting macronutrient calories, while getting the maximum micronutrients.

What many diets suggest is simply limit calories without regard to all the micronutrients and since it is only for a short period, there is no long term impact. Still others try to promote supplements or enriched shakes to bridge the gap. These are all short-term solutions and probably the reason so many regain the weight.

So in the next few posts, we’ll take a look at the three macronutrients (fuel): protein, carbohydrates, and fat and begin to unravel this evolutionary mystery.  I’ll attempt to reframe them as fuel and give you a good way to think about not just how they the body “burns” them, but more importantly, how this ties back into the overall thermodynamic balance your body must maintain.

Fat or thin, fit or unhealthy, your body stays within a degree or so of it’s set point.  It does so by managing HEAT not TEMPERATURE and we’ll see that a lot of the issues with perceived contradictions of the calorie come back to misapplication of macronutrient  connections and an too much generalization about what your body really needs.

Thermal Loading and The Matrix. How does Weight Less and Weight Loss collide with Cold?In the eye opening scene of the Matrix, Neo learns from Morpheus that Humans had developed “machines” that possessed an artificial intelligence so advanced, they’d taking over. Humans were farmed in vast systems and spare brain processing power and heat were used to power this advanced, computer-based world.

Energy was a commodity farmed and Humans the crop used to produce this excess energy as heat. Could it be that you are leaving a major contributor to caloric out when you focus only on diet and exercise?

The Matrix is  without doubt, one of my favorite movies. To top it off, I was fortunate enough to get to work on special effects/consulting for the two sequels on the “Burly Brawl” and the scenes when Neo masters gravity. We did a week of weightlessness flights for the directors, so they could “get the science right.”

I distinctly remember working with Master Woo-Ping and the other martial arts stunt artist and being HORRIBLY out of shape. I really loved martial arts in high school and college and to be able to work with such amazing talent and feel like an out of shape blob; well it really sucked. In the end, these guys got their physics correct and for these skilled martial artists it was clear that there is a big difference in ZeroG vs Earths Gravity.

It’s somewhat surprising that such a great effort goes into producing a movie for entertainment and yet we have a medical and fitness industry that seems to discount major variables in the weight loss conundrum.

Until recently, the diet-exercise paradigm was the only game in town. We all marched in lockstep with an industry that hasn’t reevaluated  a dietary “calorie” in over 100 years.  More and more are questioning and see that it all “just doesn’t add up.” Sure, it’s opened the door for all kinds of baseless schemes for losing weight, but at least people are questioning.

In the past, we didn’t look past what wass displayed on a nutrition label and most seem to understand that is just a charade game to hide the numbers and promote sales. There are still others that doubt a “calorie is a calorie,” because of this paradoxical loss of energy. Not only do the Atwater factors need a significant overhaul, we know that other factors will play a role beyond  these crude assessments of energy. We’ve been “sold” all of the therapeutical qualities of heat, from hot tubs to yoga, and yet heat is the one thing our bodies always have in excess.

Cold Stress – The Future

The most exciting boosts in immune and cardiovascular system performance are hidden in mild cold stress.

Should we really be surprise that the caloric balance doesn’t add up when we are not accounting for the largest loss in energy – excess waste heat? Imagine doing your monthly house budget and then simply leave out the heating of your house in the winter.

Think you might get caught short changed?

What I am working to change is the idea that food, exercise and thermal load (environment) are all important. One of the most adaptive evolutionary processes for Human migration beyond the tropical zones was the development clothing and the ability to control the temperature of our environment. This allowed us to move out of the tropical zones and into environments we are biologically ill-prepared.

Not unlike the future Sci-Fi world of The Matrix, in which humans evolved smart machines that eventually destroyed them, our nutritional-based disease and obesity abundance could very well be tied to not only our ability to farm and grow an abundance of food, but our neutral thermal environment provided by nearly ubiquitous conditioned air.  What complicates this excessively caloric dense food could very well be our lack of routine exposure to mild cold stress to keep our circulatory and immune system in tip-top shape.

Thermodynamically speaking, we’ve become extremely lazy.

Routine cold stress can be helpful for exercising these autonomic systems in the same way that weight-resistance strengthens the muscles. After all, we know our body adapts to many forms of stress in a protective and positive way. We don’t heal an injured knee by isolating it until it’s perfectly fixed; we introduce physical therapy early on so that it can heal and strengthen at the same time.

Routine cold stress goes well beyond simple weight loss. It has been shown to be beneficial in depression, immune system, chronic fatigue syndrome, and even life longevity.

The biggest hurdle is really a mental game. YOU have to get over the fear and anxiety associated with mild cold stress. This return to womb mentality, where everything should be not only completely neutral in temperature, but worse, slightly warm.

So many people associate sweating with working out, that they fail to see that sweating is merely the body’s response to the excess heat generated by the activity. When the body experiences a temperature below the thermal neutral point, it has two choices: cool down or generate heat.

The processes, shivering and non-shivering thermogenesis, have been studied extensively, but what is lacking is an aggregation of the side benefits of evolutionary mild cold stress. Make no mistake EVERYONE experienced some form of mild cold stress up until about 100 years ago. In evolution’s eye, the last century is an insignificant blip.

Ok, I’ve admitted that I have never taken an ice bath.  Part of it was because I was exploring other forms of mild stress that were not as well-studied and part was, well, I don’t like cold either. While I have probably dealt with much more COOL exposure than the average person, it really isn’t that bad and anyone can adapt in just a few days.

Cold can be much more challenging. Over the last month I have been working on cold showers. There are some amazing benefits, but I think the classic video from Andrew at Crossfit London, I too was a bit challenged.

Ok, he’s a bit over the top, but I can tell you that while I didn’t  squeal, my mind was really telling me I am a complete nut.  What I have learned from some really incredible sources is that there is an adaptation methodology and that ANYONE can be completely comfortable in just a few weeks.

I’ve collected a lot of really great information on the potential benefits and we’ll be introducing both an ebook and new coaching program  in the weeks ahead.   I believe now that this is definitely worth my full time consideration, but I have self-funded most of the research to date and I need your help pushing it to the next level; I don’t have the unlimited (or limited) government research funding these days. I need to raise funds for equipment, travel and supplies. Many would just slap together a slick marketing campaign and sell nothing.  I just don’t work that way. I have to know something will work and I’ve now spent a half of a year listening, email and reading comments.

Please take a minute to scroll up on the left side of the screen consider making a monthly donation to this program. You can also make a one time donation here:

A lot of exciting times and I can’t wait to share it with all of you. It’s fantastic that with the 4 Hour Body out so much new attention is being place on this. There are some fantastic scientists I have met during the last three years following this and offering a lot of great direction and advice.  It seems after a few false starts over the last 40 years, therapeutic cold stress is here to stay.

So what will it be? the Red Pill or the Blue Pill? Really, I’d rather you just push the orange button.

I’m not much of a swimmer, but I want to be.  In 2011 it is a major personal fitness goal to try to swim more frequently. The interesting irony is that I was in the pool and spa industry for about a decade and yet I wasn’t ever a swimmer. Most are not; in fact, health and fitness isn’t very common in the industry at all.  There seems to be more focus on fountains than fitness.

It’s the first day  of summer here the the Northern Hemisphere…to all of the readers in the Southern part of the world, you are in the thermal loading sweet spot right now – enjoy.

My initial thoughts of thermal loading came from a detailed analysis of Michael Phelps and his enormous caloric intake.  I was able to talk to him for a few minutes this fall and finally thank him for the inspiration.

If you google “weight loss and swimming,” you’ll find site after site that indicates swimming is bad for losing weight or that swimmers tend to put on body fat. I’ve done an exhaustive literature review and I am confident that both of these assertions are wrong. Most of the quotes comparing  swimming, running and cycling find their root in an 1987 study by Gwinup (1). In it, he compares the three activities in the absence of caloric restriction or monitoring of any kind.

Essentially this study followed moderately obese women in one of  three activities, walking, stationary bicycle, and swimming over a 6 month period.  This is probably one of the most extensively cited papers I have seen.  The results were that walking and cycling caused a drop in weight and swimmers actually gained.  It is astounding that it’s been 24 years ago and not much more has been completed.

The problem with the study as I see it is they didn’t ask the people to restrict diet in any way. If in fact swimming could result in a greater caloric burn due to the thermal load of the water, couldn’t that explain the increase hunger? If they were not instructed on how to specifically counter this, would that account for the weight gain? This is generally applied to everyone, but wouldn’t someone that is applying swimming as part of a comprehensive diet/exercise program understand they had to keep calories restricted?

It is plausible to expect that the additional drain of energy from the thermal load of the water could cause the body to signal hunger.  Remember, the body regulates heat (energy) not temperature, so we might expect the body to simply turn on the hunger mechanism in response to the energy deficit caused by increased heat drain. Most importantly, might we expect that armed with this knowledge, we could turn off, or resist, this hunger trigger with proper diet and nutrition?

I believe the answer is yes.

Gappmaier (2) had some VERY harsh words in 2006 retort to the oft-cited Gwinup paper. He felt that while the data Gwinup suggested from his study might substantiate the opinion offered, the other labs cited in the paper have never published any data/papers supporting it. Gappmaier’s view was that most of the research on modes of aerobic exercise had gone into the cardiorespiratory changes, not weight loss.  In the end, Gwinup didn’t control the very variable that was necessary to draw his conclusions, nevertheless, it has been cited over and over for the last 24 years.

Gappmaier found that with similar frequency, duration, and intensity, swimming results are comparable in terms of weight loss. This parity is good news, but of course it likely  is based on a relatively warm and  consistent water temperature and that is where I think the big opportunities to boost the results reside going forward.

In the last year, I really wanted to find a better way to thermal load in the summer. As well, I wanted to know exactly what the truth is concerning water thermal conductivity and the Human body’s loss of thermal energy (calories). There is no doubt it happens, but there is a question of rate. A somewhat exhaustive review of the literature on the thermoregulatory side found that the simple one dimensional math model I outlined two years ago gave a pretty good fit to actual Human data of the 50s & 60s.

This data was collected to assess macronutrient requirements of military personnel in a cold stress environment; ironically they were studies on how to keep weight on, not lose it.  I know it works, but what are the best methods and how quickly can one lose?

I’ve talked with MANY people following both the TEDMED talk and 4HB and I am astonished at just how much fear we have of cold as a society. In fact, the fear is so great that people often interpret “cool” as cold and begin to bundle at what was a very comfortable room temperature just a few years ago.

Over that last 2 months I have been putting in a new lab and looking at methods to better assess my own progress. Taking one for the “Team” out there, I put about 12 lbs on and want to take it off (with interest) using a solid diet/nutrition plan and swimming. I now have the capability to go down to 45F/7C water temperature for swimming in a swim spa…we’ll see how brave I get.

What I know for sure is that there are studies that seem to verify increased hunger associated with swimming. All of the other references you see, in one way or another, lead back to Gwinup 87.  The vast majority don’t control diet at the same time and suggest that increase hunger makes swimming a futile process for weight loss.

I am not buying it.

I have spoken to so many ex-swimmers that rave about weight loss when getting back into the water. The thermal models say it should work. Most importantly, swimming is probably one the very few physical activities that one can do for a lifetime. You can start at any age or level of fitness and if it IS hot and sticky, it’s a fantastic way to relax.

I still need your help in part of this. I am going to begin collecting data in the next few weeks. Part of what I really need to add to all of the current equipment is a thermal imager.  Be sure to click the voting widget up and to the right and I’ll be sending out requests soon in attempts to get this funded.

So, if you are a swimmer, get your suit on and dive in…even BETTER if you are a swimmer going into winter in the southern hemisphere >grin<. I’ll be subjecting myself to even more extreme self-experiments over the coming months and will report back what I learn.

If you haven’t learned to swim- I feel your pain. I too had an incredibly difficult time getting instruction as an adult. I wasn’t afraid of water (once an avid scuba diver), just didn’t know how to “swim laps;” thanks goes out to Al Bayhi @ iSport.com. If you are in the Bay-area, this guy is THE best.

After much personal study of the Total Immersion techniques, as Tim describes in 4HB, I was able to move from zero ability to swimming comfortably over a 5 day period, 3 hours of instruction a day. It was sort of a brutal immersion, but I REALLY learned a lot. From the aches and pains it is clear to me that I exerted a lot of physical energy during the process.

Swimmin is a great compliment to whatever exercise/diet program you are doing, so get into the swim of things and shed some unwanted body fat.

1.  Gwinup, G. (1987). Weight loss without dietary restriction: Efficacy of different forms of aerobic exercise. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 15, 275-279

2. Gappmaier E, Lake W, Nelson AG, Fisher AG.  Aerobic exercise in water versus walking on land: effects on indices of fat reduction and weight loss of obese women The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2006, 46:564-569

Scott Parazynski Repairs damaged Solar panel on the International Space StationThe last few weeks have been an unbelievable adventure. Sorry to leave you hanging on calories, but we’ll get back to that soon.  The days have been full of travel ranging from an amazing party hosted by Tim Ferriss in San Francisco to hanging out with Wim Hof (aka iceman) and good friend Astronaut, Scott Parazynski.  It’s an honor to interact with all of these incredible minds and we are all starting to see a real momentum in the power of the chill.

My home state (and city) were also hit hard by a the tornados and on a brighter note, the 4HB prescription of beans and cold showers were an unexpected preparation for 5 days of no power.

Chilling Out

Wim Hof, aka Iceman, in an over one our immersion in Ice during a May demonstration in Orlando

Wim Hof, aka Iceman, in an over one our immersion in Ice during a May demonstration in Orlando

If you haven’t seen my TEDMED video, it’s posted on the right.  What an incredible opportunity to get the word out and it’s opened some fantastic doors.  I want to give you a sneak peak at some exciting work to come.  Many have asked for a “step by step” guide on how they can use the power of cool in their everyday routine and I’ve assembled an amazing team to bring that to you. You’ll see it posted here when it’s ready, but it’s extremely exciting to me.  It was great to finally meet Wim Hof and his son, Enahm in person. We’ve been in communication for a while over email, facebook, and twitter, but spending 2 quality days deep in discussion was amazing. I got to watch Wim do a 1 hour and 15 minute full body ice immersion and it was really incredible. Wim insists anyone can do it with training.

I also want you to consider contributing to our research.  On the right, I’ve asked a question about funding a thermal imager to document some of our crazy ideas. I put this up just after my last blog post (eeek –  almost TWO months ago) and it hasn’t had much input. Please take just a few seconds to vote. I really want to create a community here and you have my promise that this is not going to be another fad diet scheme. As you will see this site is dedicated to a thorough exploration of what the human body can achieve. We’re going to look at the best we ALL can be, not just focus on the extreme or elite. We do have an unbelievable research team and you can bet we’re not putting our life-long reputations on the line for junk science. We have a drive to understand this and help ANYONE that choses to succeed.

From Weightless to Weight Loss

John Glenn, Scott Parazynski, Steve Robinson training on STS-95 Aerogel Payload with Principle Investigator, Ray Cronise

John Glenn, Scott Parazynski, Steve Robinson training on STS-95 Aerogel Payload with Principle Investigator, Ray Cronise

So Today, I want to introduce a good friend, former “office mate,” and an die hard adventurer: Scott Parazynski.  He’s got the dream resume: Astronaut, MD, and Mountain Climber and that is just a START. Scott and I met in 1998 during a training session in preparation for his STS-95 mission along with crewmate, John Glenn. He was a backup to operate a science experiment I had proposed for the space shuttle on Aerogel; ironically, it was a extremely high tech transparent INSULATOR.

Scott and I spoke frequently in the time between his two Everest climbs, because he was the most knowledgeable person I knew on the subject of human adaptation and was willing to help me explain and verify my initial 2008  results.  I’m sure in the “heat” of being cold on Everest he thought back a time or two about our frigid fat loss conversations, but Scott has been in extremely good shape as long as I knew him. he didn’t have any body fat to lose.

So let me turn it over to Scott to tell you a little about his adventure and experience with cool…

…Take it away, Scott.

A summit climb up Everest conjures up images of raging winds, breathless exhaustion and bone chilling temperatures, but rarely does one think of fad diets and dramatic weight loss. I had the (dis)fortune of spending two climbing seasons on Mount Everest, for a total of 4 months at extreme cold and altitude. Both of these seasons entailed dramatic weight loss, to the tune of 25 pounds (12 kilograms) each Himalayan foray. In the frequent keynotes I’m asked to give, I often make reference to the future New York Times bestseller I need to write, entitled “The Everest Diet!”

My first trip to Everest in 2008 was the fulfillment of a life long dream. As a climber since high school and a 17-year NASA astronaut, I’d seen and dreamt of standing atop the tallest mountain in the world for many years. My early heroes were all great adventurers, including the pioneers of space, mountaineering and deep sea exploration. Years later, my photo of Everest, taken from 250 miles up during Space Shuttle mission STS-66, is still perhaps the finest ever captured from space: it was a cloud-free day in the Himalayas on November 3, 1994, and the telephoto image reads just like a topographic map (you should post the image if possible with the article, along with one of me on the summit?). Staring at Everest from space and the framed photograph of the peak I kept above my desk, it was perhaps inevitable that I’d one day travel to the mountain for the ultimate physical and mental challenge.

Scott Parazynski on the Summit of Everest. He lost 25 lbs on this climb in part due to the extremely cold conditions

On the 59th day of my 2008 expedition to Everest, while at 24,500 feet above sea level on my summit push, I developed excruciating lower back pain. I later discovered that this was due to a ruptured disc in my lower back. Hobbling down outrageously steep terrain to base camp, and later flying in a medivac helicopter to Kathmandu, I eventually underwent surgery to remove a ruptured lumbar disc. With hard training and a personal inability to leave the job left undone, I returned to the mountain in 2009, and was successful in summiting on May 20th of that year.

The punch line of this story, however, has to do with the cold, and lots of it. BOTH of my seasons resulted in substantial weight loss, despite a concerted effort to consume mass quantities of calories, often in excess of 5000 each day. Granted, substantial physical exertion is required to climb the world’s tallest peak, and it’s difficult to choke down that many calories because of the hypoxia and poor appetite common at high altitude. That said, I certainly ascribe many of the LB’s I lost to the cold. To be clear, I went to the Himalayas each year a “hard body,” without much if any excess fat, so the pounds I ended up losing came from lean muscle mass. I’m convinced much of this loss was from the chronic cold conditions: shivering burns many calories, as does just keeping comfortable in less austere temperatures typical of mid-day and in-the-sleeping-bag rest on the mountain.

In closing, it’s no mystery to me that keeping cool means keeping lean. Not many people would go to the extreme of climbing Mount Everest to lose big time weight, but dropping the thermostat or swimming in cool water may just be the ticket to shed those unwanted pounds…

Thanks Scott!  We’ll be hearing much more from Scott as we dive into some great self experimentation on thermal loading and weight loss.

In mean time, if you want to learn a lot more about Scott Everest/Space adventures and your chance at private space travel, please take a look at Scott’s TEDMED talk here:

7 M&Ms a are all it takes takes to gain 50 lbs in 20 years. Former Nasa scientist Ray Cronise thinks he can help with Thermal LodingIt was hard to believe when I scratched out the arithmetic on my weight gain in a notebook.  It was 50 lbs over 20 years.  It seems like a lot, but when we think about this in a more scientific light, what’s quite astonishing is that I didn’t gain MORE.

If you did gain more, then let me give you a little reassurance that you’re not the only one.  Today we will start delving into the other side of thermodynamics to give you a more complete picture of my research over the last three years.

As most of you know by now, especially those who have reached out with data and emails, my life and study does not center on some malevolent plan to make you miserably “freeze your ass off.” Read Full Article →

changing your temperature slowly will help with thermal diet and thermal loadingWe’ve just had an unseasonably warm week in my hometown. That’s not completely true, it happens this way nearly every year.  A week or two of cold and then suddenly, it’s warm.

For the last two years, I’ve been studying people and their reaction to the environment around them. Not with loads of data and analysis, but the more reflective, subjective type of observation.

The one take away is that most don’t realize just how adaptable the human body can be – if allowed. Read Full Article →

It’s been an incredible 6 weeks… I really appreciate all the emails and comments and the amazing number of people that have signed up to read and follow this site.  I know what everyone is asking,

“Ray, can you just tell me what to do?”

The answer is YES, but hang on a bit. One thing I expected would happen is the  “me too” people  that would just start driveling about being cold and losing weight. The other expectation was that it would be presented as miserable and extreme. I wanted to support the ideas within The 4-hour body before beginning to suggest alternative/complementary approaches. Unfortunately, the health and fitness industry is loaded people that earn expert status by learning a few new words. Face it, we’ve never been more unfit as a species and we’ve also never spent more achieving it. That’s quite a contradiction.

Perhaps it’s time to change that even if it’s just a small group of us.

Read Full Article →